infokito

Portal Palembang – Jembatan informasi dari kito untuk kito bersamo

Menag: Non Muslim Jangan Ikut Campur Soal Ahmadiyah

Posted by infokito™ pada 28 Mei 2008

Kendati gesekan antar umat beragama mengalami penurunan yang cukup signifikan. Namun persoalan internal agama masih banyak yang harus diselesaikan, seperti masalah Ahmadiyah yang dianggap umat Islam merupakan penyimpangan ajaran agama. Karena itu Menteri Agama M Maftuh Basyuni mengimbau penyelesaian masalah tersebut dapat diselesaikan sendiri oleh penganut agama masing-masing.

“Masalah Islam dengan Ahmadiyah, saya harapkan non muslim tidak usah campur tangan, ” kata Menteri Agama saat membuka Rapat Kerja Daerah Kantor Wilayah Departemen Agama provinsi DKI Jakarta, Selasa (27/5).

Menag mengatakan, sejak penerbitan SKB no 9 dan 8 yang tahun 2006 tentang kerukunan umat beragama, gesekan antar umat beragama mengalami penurunan, dan patut disyukuri SKB tersebut disusun oleh perwakilan majelis-majelis agama.

Maftuh menyarankan, masalah yang menyangkut internal agama tersebut, sebaiknya diselesaikan sendiri, karena hal itu lebih baik dari pada mengikut sertakan orang atau golongan banyak.

Terkait tentang penerbitan Surat Keputusan Bersama (SKB) tentang aliran Ahmadiyah yang belum juga diterbitkan, Menag mengakui masih ada kendala antara lain belum adanya pertemuan antara ketiga menteri yang menandatangani SKB tersebut. Meski demikian, Maftuh Basyuni tetap menjanjikan SKB yang ditunggu-tunggu itu segera terbit.

Berdasarkan Rapat Koordinasi Badan Koordinasi Pengawas Aliran Kepercayaan Masyarakat (Bakor Pakem) Ahmadiyah telah menyimpang dari ajaran Islam, sehingga ketiga pejabat menteri yakni, Menteri Agama, Menteri Dalam Negeri, dan Jaksa Agung perlu segera menerbitkan SKB tersebut. (novel)***eramuslim

9 Tanggapan to “Menag: Non Muslim Jangan Ikut Campur Soal Ahmadiyah”

  1. Abubakar Bang'Asyir said

    Pak Mentri, YANG SALAH BUKAN NON MUSLIM TETAPI MUI, RABITHAH ALAM ISLAMI DAN FUI yang telah mencap non-muslim atas Ahmadiyah. Wajar saja jika kaum Nasionalis non munslim ikut prihatin terhadap penganiayaan dan perampasan HAM Ahmadiyah oleh kelompok-kelompok FUNDAMETALIS ISLAM seperti itu. Lagi pula kelompok non- muslim Indonesia jangan kita anggap remah dan bodoh, mereka mengerti KONSTITUSI NKRI DAN HAM YANG BERLAKU UNIVERSAL. MEREKA SUSAH MEMBANGUN GEREJA, BANYAK GEREJA MEREKA YANG DIHANCURKAN ATASNAMA SKB PENYEBARAN AGAMA dan mereka banyak disusahkan dengan KETIDAKADILAN dari kelompok yang suka menyebut diri MAYORITAS, padahal mereka hanya segelintir kaum gundamentalis yang mengatasna makan ISLAM. TAPI ALHAMDULILLAH PAK MENTRI MASIH MENGAKUI AHMADIYAH BAGIAN DARI ISLAM DAN UMAT ISLAM, SYUKRON.

  2. 1, Ahmadiyah (B4) adalah wajib hadir benar menurut hujjah Allah, hujjah nabi Muhammad saw.(A4), hujjah kitab suci-Nya, secara sunnatullah terjadi pada tiap-tiap agama empat besar yaitu Buddha Hinayana (A1)-Mahayana/Terawada (B1) asal usul Adam (A1)-Nuh (B1), Hindu Brahma samaj (A2)-Arya samaj (B2) asal-usul Ibrahim (A2)-Luth (B2), Yahudi (A3)-Nasrasi (B3), Islam Muhammad (A4)-Ahmadiyah (B4) sebagai aturan dalil rumusan:

    1. Ali Imran (3) ayat 31,32,33,34: Adam-Nuh sesuai Maryam (19) ayat 58, terjadinya pembunuhan oleh Kabil (A1) kakaknya terhadap Habil (B1) adiknya sesuai Al Maidah (5) ayat 27-32,Yohanes 8:58,59.
    2. Keluarga Ibrahim (Ibrahim (A2)- Luth (B2) sesuai Al Hajj (22) ayat 43) pengusiran sifat Kabil (A2) terhadap sifat Habil (B2) sesuai Al A’raaf (7) ayat 82, atau pembunuhan oleh umat Ibrahim (A2) terhadap yesus (B2) zaman Luth sesuai Yohanes 8:39,40.
    3. Keluarga Imran (Musa (A3)-Isa/Yesus (B3) sesuai Al Baqarah (2) ayat 87) pembunuhan oleh kakanya Yahudi (Kabil A3) terhadap adiknya Nasrani/Yesus (Habil B3) sesuai An Nisaa (4) ayat 157,158,159, Matius 27:35, Markus 15:24, Lukas 23:33, Yohanes 18:19.
    4. Keluarga Muhammad (Muhammad A4-Ahmad B4) sesuai Al Fath (48) ayat 29 sifat Taurat membunuh sifat Injil sesuai Ash Shaff (61) ayat 6,7,8,14 adalah pembunuhan sifat Kabil/kakanya (umat Muhammad A4) terhadap sifat Habil/adiknya (umat Ahmadiyah B4).
    4. Mereka semuanya disifati Kitab A-Hikmah B, Taurat A-Injil B sesuai Ali Imran (3) ayat 48, Sifat Yahudi A-Nasrani B sesuai Al Maidah (5) ayat 44,46.
    5. umat Muhammad A4 pembunuh terhadap Ahmadiayh B4 dihadapan Allah mempunyai 2 dosa sedang Ahmadiyah B4 tidak melawan.
    6. Tiap-tiap pembunuhan sifat Yahudi (A3) minta pertolongan penguasa pemerintah seperti Yahudi (A3) meminta tolong Pilatus dan Herodus untuk membunuh Yesus (B3), dan umat Muhammad A4 meminta pertolongan pemerintah RI untuk membubarkan Ahmadiah (B4).
    7. Tiap-tiap rasul/nabi dari dahulu berpasangan (Adam-Nuh, Ibrahim-Luth, Musa-Isa/Yesus, Muhammad-Ahmad), sesuai Ar Ra’d (13) ayat 38, Al Ahzab (33) ayat 6, Yasin (36) ayat 13,14.

    Inilah kebenaran yang hakiki benar menurut aturan dalil rumusan Allah sejak Adam sampai hari ini.

    Wasalam, Soegana Gandakoesoema, Pembaharu Persepsi Tunggal Agama millennium ke-3 masehi.

  3. MENTERI AGAMA MENGATAKAN: NON MUSLIM JANGAN IKUT CAMPUR SOAL AHMADIYAH KARENA MENTERI AGAMA SEDANG MENGIKUTI FPI HABIB RIZIEQ SHIHAB MELAKSANAKAN AT TAUBAH (9) AYAT 97 !!!

  4. aya said

    to bang ásyir
    saya rasa anda sangat salah mengatakan itu cuma keinginan fundamentalis islam, yang benar,semua orang islam sepakat bahwa ahmadiyah itu bukan islam, tapi mnyesatkan islam.klo ada muslim yang membela ahmadiyah ,paling jg islam KTP,orang islam tp gak mau syariat islam.orang islam tapi gak ngerti tentang islam,makanya…disangkanya sama saja islam dengan ahmadiyah.atau mungkin anda pengikutnya gus dur,yang kaya udah dikultuskan tuh sama pengikutnya,jd salahpun tetap didukung.maklumlah namanya jg lulusan israel,jd pemikirannya ya kaya org israel.makanya belajar agama tuh yang bener,cari kebenaran yang hakiki.ok….

  5. Menteri Agama Maftuh Basyuni Berpandangan Non Muslim Jangan Ikut Campur Soal Ahmadiyah.

    Dari anggapan maftuh basyuni ini saja kami mengetahui bahwa dia mengaku islam tetapi tidak pernah membaca kitab suci nabi Muhammad saw., sehingga memperbodoh dirinya sendiri

    Al Baqarah (2) ayat 148: Dan bagi tiap umat ada kiblatnya masing-nasing dimana dia tertuju (kiblat nabinya, rasulnya, kitabnya, aqidahnya, syariatnya, ritualnya, muamalahnya, tempat ibadahnya dan lain-lain). sebab itu berlomba-lombalah kamu dalam berbuat kebaikan (berpersepsi agama). Dimana saja kamu berada (diagama apapun) PASTI ALLAH akan akan mengumpulkan kamu semua (yang beragama). Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Kuasa atas segala sesuatu (menyatukan umat menjadi satu sesuai An Nahl (16) ayat 93, dan Muhammad-Ahmad dalam Al Fath (48) ayat 29, Ash Shaff (61) ayat 6,7,8,14 dan menurunkan ilmu-Nya di Indonesia awal millennium ke-3).
    Hai Mahtuh Basyuni jangan memalukan umat Islam terhadap umat agama yang lainnya islam sejak dahulu sesuai Al Hajj (22) ayat 78, karena ternyata anda tidak mengetahui isi kitab suci nabi Muhammad saw. atau meninggalkan Al Quarn seperti kata Al Furqaan (25) ayat 30, padahal Al Quran mudah sesuai Al Qamar (54) ayat 17,22,32,40.
    Sekali lagi Maftuh Basyuni jangan memalukan umat Islam, sekali lagi jangan memalukan umat Islam, sekali lagi jangan memalukan umat Islam.

    Salamun ‘alaikum daiman fi yaumiddin, Soegana Gandakoesoema, Pembaharu Persepsi Tunggal Agama millennium ke-3 masehi.

  6. Untuk jelasnya mengenai Ahmadiyah, milikilah, bacalah, telitilah, selidikilah, fahamilah, yakinilah dan imanilah buku panduan terhadap isi kitab-kitab suci agama-agama, hasil karya tulis ilmiah alamiah penelitian otodidak selama 25 tahun berjudul

    “BHINNEKA CATUR SILA TUNGGAL IKA”
    Penulis: Soegana Gandakoesoema
    Penerbit: GOD-A CENTRE
    Bonus: “SKEMA TUNGGAL ILMU LADUNI TEMPAT ACUAN AYAT KITAB SUCI TENTANG KESATUNAN AGAMA (GLOBALISASI)” berukuran 53×60 cm.
    Mendapat sambutan dari Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, SekDitJen Bimas Buddha,Pendeta Nasrani dan Tokoh Islam Pakistan.

    Tersedia ditoko-toko buku distributor tunggal
    P.T. BUKU KITA
    Telp. 021.78881850
    Fax. 021.78881860

    Salamun ‘alaikum daiman fi yaumiddin, Soegana Gandakoesoema, Pembaharu Persepsi Tunggal Agama millennium ke-3 masehi.

  7. Non Muslim boleh ikut campur soal Ahmadiyah menurut hujjah Allah, hujah nabi Muhammad saw. dan hujjah kitab suci-Nya sesuai:
    Al Baqarah (2) ayat 148: Tiap-tiap umat mempunyai kiblatnya masing-masing dimana dia tertuju kepadanya. Berlomba-lombalah kamu dalam kebaikan (berpersepsi agama). Dimana saja kamu berada (diagama apapun) PASTI Allah akan mengumpulkan semua kalian (diera globalisasi sesuai Al isro (17) ayat 104, Al Kahfi (18) ayat 99, Al Qari’ah (101) ayat 4, untuk mendirikan Agama-Allah memenuhi An Nashr (110) ayat 1,2,3). Allah Maha Kuasa atas segala sesuatu.
    Menteri Agama RI Mahtuf Basyuni tidak mengerti apa-apa tentang maksud ayat ini. KASIAN DEH LOOO!

    Salamun ‘alaikum daiman fi yaumiddin, Soegana Gandakoesoema, Pembaharu Persepsi Tunggal Agama millennium ke-3 masehi

  8. Sun of the West said

    Dear readers,

    Here I present the verdicts and views on the issue of over a dozen celebrities of Islam, who represent all time periods starting from contemporaries of Hadhrat Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, to the time of Hadhrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, peace be upon him, founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. None of these people belonged to the said movement, since the latter did not even exist then. Yet, the opinions they held, are contrary to present non-Ahmadiyya views. Take a look at the following names, and see if any bells ring in your minds — regarding their status in the Muslim world in their being great scholars of authority and also, note their respective time periods:

    1. Ummul Mo’mineen, Hazrat Ayesha Siddeeqa R.A., (death year 58 A.H.) (the Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh) blessed consort)
    2. Imam Raaghib Al Isfahani (RA) (died 502 A.H.)
    3. Hazrat Syyed Abdul Qaadir Jilaani, AR (died 562 A.H.)

    (This scholar was also Mujaddid of the 6th century)

    4. Hazrat Mohiyyuddin Ibni ‘Arabi, AR (died 638 A.H.)
    5. Hazrat Maulana Jalaaluddin Roomi (died 672 A.H.)
    6. Hazrat Syed Abdul Karim Jilaani, AR (died 767 A.H.)

    7. Imam Abdul Wahhab She’raani AR (died 976 A.H.)
    8. Imam Muhammad Tahir, AR (died 986 A.H.)
    9. Al Imam Ali Qaari AR (died 1014 A.H.)
    10. Hazrat Shah Waliyullah Muhaddith of Delhi, AR (died 1176 A.H.)
    11. Hazrat Maulvi Abdul Haye of Lakhnow, AR (died 1304 A.H.)
    12. Hazrat Maulvi Muhammad Qaasim of Nanauta, AR (died 1307 A.H.)

    (founder of the Deoband school)

    13. Nawab Siddeeq Hasan of Bhopal, AR (died 1307 A.H.)

    These towering figures in Islam have given their verdict about how Muslims should interpret “Khatam-an-Nabiyyeen” (Seal of the Prophets). All of them believed in the continuation of prophethood.

    Hazrat Ayesha Al Siddeeqah (ra)

    First of all, Hazrat Ayesha Al Siddeeqah’s verdict:

    “QOOLOO INNAHU KHATAMUL ANBIYAA’I WA LAA TAQOOLOO LAA NABIYYA BA’DAHU”

    (Takmilah Majma’ul Bihaar, p. 85)

    “Say he is ‘seal of prophets’ but do NOT say ‘there is no prophet after him'”

    It appears that she knew that the statement could easily be misconstrued, and to the effect, presented her valued clarification.

    Imam Raaghib Al Isfahaani

    Our second hero, the saint Imam Raaghib Al Isfahaani, Rehmatullah Alaih wrote:

    “Prophethood is of two kinds, general and special. The special prophethood, viz: the law-bearing prophethood is now unattainable; but the general prophethood continues to be attainable.”

    (Bahr al Muheet, vol. 3, p. 28)

    The “general” kind of prophethood is also the one that Ahmadi Muslims believe continues, and not the law-bearing one.

    Hazrat Sayyed Abdul Qaadir Jilaani

    The founder of the “Qadiriyya” school, Hazrat Sayyed Abdul Qaadir Jilaani (R.A.) wrote:

    “These attributes are found in the Holy Prophet in the highest abundance, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him. That is the reason why he is called Khataman Nabiyyeen.”

    (Tuhfa Mursala Shareef: p. 5)

    This, indeed is the exact same view that Ahmadi Muslims hold, about the expression of Khataman Nabiyyeen, yet, they are singled out by a lot of modern day Muslims as non-Muslims. Why not expel Hazrat Jilaani from Islam first, since he held this view first?

    Hazrat Mohiyyuddin Ibni Arabi

    Hazrat Mohiyyuddin Ibni Arabi (Rehmatullah Alaihi) wrote:

    “’ISAA ALIHIS SALAAMU YANZILU FEENA HAKAMAN MIN GHAIRI TASHREE’IN WA HUWA NABIYYUN BILAA SHAKKIN”

    (Fatoohati Makkiyyah, vol. 1, p. 570)

    “Jesus, may peace be upon him, will descend upon us as a Hakam, without a law and will be a prophet without any doubt.”

    Then he writes:

    “That prophethood which ended with the advent of the Prophet (pbuh), is only law-bearing prophethood and not the status of prophethood. Thus now there will be no law that cancels the law of the Prophet (pbuh) or that adds to its commandments”

    (Fatoohaati Makkiyyah, vol. 2, p. 3)

    Then he writes:

    “FAMARTAFA’ATIL NUBUWWATU BIL KULLIYYATI LIHAAZA QULNAA INNA MA-ARTAFA’TU NUBUWWATAT TASHREE’I FA HAAZA MA’ANI ‘LAA NABIYYA BA’DAHU”

    “Thus prophethood has not been totally abolished. This is why we have said that only law-bearing prophethood has been abolished and this is what is the meaning of (the Hadith) ‘there is no prophet after him’ “

    Hazrat Maulana Room

    The great saint, Hazrat Maulana Room (Rehmatullah Alaihi) writes:

    “Make such plans to perform righteousness in the way of God that you attain prophethood within the Ummat (religious community)”

    Hazrat Sayyed Abdul Kareem Jilani

    Hazrat Sayyed Abdul Kareem Jilani, the renowned mystic of the 8th century of Hijra wrote:

    “Hazrat Muhammad, peace and blessings on him, is the Khataman Nabiyyeen because he attained the highest perfection which no prophet ever did”

    (Al Insaanul Kaamil: vol. 1, Ch 36. Pg 69)

    Clearly, the controversial expression “khataman nabiyyeen” according to him, was not based on the Prophet’s (pbuh) being last.

    Hazrat Imam Abdul Wahhab She’raani

    Hazrat Imam Abdul Wahhab She’raani (Alaihir Rehmah) wrote:

    “FA INNA MUTLAQAN NUBUWWATI LAM TARTAFI’ WA INNAMARTAFA’AT NUBUWWATUL TASHREE’I”

    (Al Yawaaqeetu Wal Jawaahir: pg 27, argument # 3)

    “Thus, without doubt, …… prophethood has not been abolished and it is only law-bearing prophethood that is abolished”

    Hazrat Imam Muhammad Tahir

    Hazrat Imam Muhammad Tahir, commenting on Hadhrat Ayesha’s (ra) statement: say he is Khataman Nabiyyeen but do not say there is not prophet after him:

    “HAZA NAAZIRUN ILAA NUZOOLI ‘ISAA WA HAZA AIZAN LAA YUNAA FEE HADEETH LA NABIYYA BA’DEE LI ANNAHU ARAADA LAA NABIYYA YANSAKHU SHAR’AHU”

    (Takmilah Majma’ul Bihaar, pg 85)

    “This saying is based on the fact that Jesus is going to descend (as prophet) and it is not against the Hadith ‘there is no prophet after me’ because the Prophet (pbuh) meant ‘there will not be any prophet who would cancel his law.”

    Hazrat Imam Ali Qaari

    Hazrat Imam Ali Qaari (Alaihir Rahmah), an Imam of the Hanafi school and a renowned interpreter of Hadeeth, wrote:

    “That there is no revelation after the Holy Prophet (pbuh) is false; there is no truth in it. Yes! in the Hadith are the words ‘La Nabiyya Ba’di’ which, according to scholars, means that there will not be such a prophet in the future who brings such a law that abrogates that of the Holy Prophet (pbuh).”

    (Al Ishaa’at Fil Sharaatis Saa’ah, pg 226)

    Hazrat Shah Waliullah

    Hazrat Shah Waliullah Muhaddith of Delhi (Alaihir Rahmah), the Mujaddid of the 12th century and given the title of “Khatamal Muhadditheen” by some writers was of the following view:

    “KHUTIMA BIHIN NABIYYOONA AI LAA YURJADU MAN YA’MURUHULLAHU SUBHAANAHU BITTASHREE’I ‘ALANNAASI”

    (Tafheemati Ilaahiyyah, Tafheem # 53)

    “The ending of prophets at the advent of the Holy Prophet means that after him, there can be no such person as would be given a law by the Almighty Allah and sent to the people.”

    Hazrat Maulvi Abdul Haye

    Hazrat Maulvi Abdul Haye of Lacknow writes:

    “After the Holy Prophet (pbuh) or during his time, for a prophet to appear is not improbable”

    (Daafi’ul Wasaawis Fee Athar Ibn Abbaas, New Edition, pg 16)

    Maulvi Muhammad Qaasim

    Maulvi Muhammad Qaasim of Nanauta (Rehmatullah Alaih) who was the founder of the Deoband Seminary, an organization now viewed with respect by anti-Ahmadiyya organizations, also believed in the views such as the ones I am presenting here. He stated:

    “According to the layman, the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings on him, being Khatam is supposed to have appeared after all the other prophets. But men of understanding and the wise know it very well that being the first or the last, chronologically, does not carry any weight. How could, therefore, the words of the Holy Quran ‘But he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of Prophets (33.41)’ mean to glorify him? But I know very well that none from among the Muslims would be prepared to agree with the common men”

    (Tahzeer-ul-Naas: pg 3)

    Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan

    Also, among recent scholars, Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan of Bhopal, who was the leader of the Ahle Hadith in India wrote:

    “The Hadith ‘La Wahya Ba’da Mautee’ is baseless, although ‘La Nabiyya Ba’adee’ is quite correct, which, according to people with knowledge, means that ‘there shall be no prophet after me who shall be raised with a new code of Law which shall abrogate my law’.”

    (Iqtarabus Saa’at: pg 162)

    This list is by no means exhaustive but representative and even so, partially. I shall leave you with a joint statement agreed upon by two scholars, Hazrat Imam Muhammad bin Abdul Baqee and Ibni ‘Asakar, which has impressed me so much with the beauty of their words that I present it to you as a closing statment, and I think what they said could not have been said better. As background knowledge, let me mention that one meaning of “Khatam” is finger-ring:

    “The meanings of KHATAMAN NABIYYEEN are that the Holy Prophet, in his physical and spiritual build, is the most charming and lovable personality, peace be upon him. This is because the glory and the spiritual magnitude of all the prophets is manifested through him and he can be likened to the beautiful ring worn for adornment.”

    (Zarqani Sharah Mwahabul Luddunia: vol. 3, pg 163 and Sehlul Huda wal Irshad: pg 55)

    I have seen a lot of the actual books of these scholars with my own eyes — where? — in the office of a friend of my father, Dost Muhammad Shahid, who is the official historian of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. I wonder if I shall ever see him again because I heard that he is imprisoned in Pakistan, in offense of having written verses of the Holy Quran. If an Ahmadi Muslim does this in Pakistan, or just “poses as a Muslim”, he/she is liable to imprisonment.

    I think I have made my case pretty fairly. I have written this series of articles not with the intention to “show off” that my understanding of the subject is better than any one else’s; it could be worse. I have tried to restrict myself to brief comments, giving most of the length to quotations. The treasure of knowledge given to us by these great scholars is our common heritage. At the time they made their invaluable contributions to knowledge, there was no Ahmadi or non-Ahmadi Muslim. I expect that readers will try to keep all hatred, malices, dislikes, prejudices and veils on hearts aside while doing the reading. Clearly, there is a wealth of information on the subject of finality or continuity of prophethood, which ever is the case. The purposes of this series has been to advance scholarship, uncover some less talked-about issues, reduce distance between people opposed to each others’ views and begin a new round of discussion which, I hope, would be free of flames, like these articles of mine have been.

    Peace be upon one who follows guidance.

    Regards To Readers,

    Copied from “On finality of Prophethood” by Rasheed A. Khan, Boston, Massachusettes, U.S.A. – Material © 1995-98 Ahmadiyya Muslim Community

  9. Soal Kesatuan Agama-agama,milikilah, bacalah, yakinilah Buku Panduan
    “Bhinneka Catur Sila Tunggal Ika”
    Bonus
    “Skema Tunggal Ilmu Laduni Tempat Acuan Ayat Kitab Suci Tentang Kesatuan Agama”
    Penulis Soegana Gaandakoesoema
    Tersedia di
    Perumahan Puri BSI Permai Blok A3
    Jl. Samudera Jaya
    Kelurahan Rangkapan Jaya
    Kecamatan Pancoran Mas
    Depok 16435
    Telp. /Fax. 02177884755
    HP. 085881409050

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

 
%d blogger menyukai ini: